Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 152542 (ALL)

ANKIT VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

A482/5884/2025 · 2025-07-22

Subhash Vidyarthi

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42074 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5884 of 2025 Applicant :- Ankit Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in three cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, detail of which are as under: "i. Case Crime No.751 of 2021, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Unnao, ii. Case Crime No.531 of 2021, under Sections 437/414/413/411/420 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali, District Unnao, and iii. Case Crime No.243 of 2024, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Dahi, District Unnao, " 4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other two cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench