VEERAVATI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/6919/2025 · 2025-07-22
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152531 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152531 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41814 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6919 of 2025 Petitioner :- Veeravati And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar,Prabhakar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Ashish Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent no. 1.
2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for following main relief:-
"(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned mutation order dated 06.09.2022 passed by the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Aanek Singh, Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil, Sawayajpur, District Hardoi, U.p. in Suit No. 7138 of 2021, computerized Suit No. T202110330507138 whereby the name of the opposite party no. 4 has been illegally mutated in the revenue records pertaining to Arazi No. 176/0.2750 Hec. situated at Village Auhadpur, Pargana Katiyari, Tehsil Sawayajpur, District Hardoi."
3. Learned counsel for petitioners has fairly submitted that after passing of the
order dated 06.09.2022, the petitioenrs ahve filed an application for recall which has also been rejected on 17.12.2024 which has not been challenged in the present writ petition.
4. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel stating that the petitioners have efficacious remedy of filing an appeal before the Sub- Divisional Magistrate U/S 35(2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
5. Accordingly, this Court finds that the petitioners have efficacious statutory remedy of filing an appeal consequently there are no grounds made out for entertaining the petition against the order of mutation.
6. For the aforesaid reasons, the petitioners have efficacious remedy, the writ petition is dismissed. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 22.7.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench