MANISH KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/6912/2025 · 2025-07-28
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152520 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152520 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43158-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6912 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Singh,Ram Sajivan Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit on behalf of petitioner filed today in Court is taken on record. 2. Heard. 3. The petitioner alleges unnecessary interference by the district/police authorities in the house or land in possession of the petitioner. 4. Mr. Adnan Ahmad, learned Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of one Ramvachan Das, Mahant of Dev Kali Mandir which is existing adjacent to the house/land purchased by the petitioner and has filed application for impleadment which is also taken on record. He alleges encroachment by the petitioner on the land of Mandir. 5. The applicant seeking impleadment has moved an application for registration of FIR though no civil proceedings have been initiated. 6. This petition is directed only against the district/police authorities. 7. Mr. Shailesh Tiwari, learned standing counsel says that the petitioner has opened a door towards the land which belongs to Nagar Palika and is a Non-ZA land, therefore, the authorities only want to protect the government land of the Nagar Palika and he does not have any instructions regarding any proposed for demolition of the petitioner's house. 8. As regards the dispute, if any, between the private
parties such as the petitioner and the applicant seeking impleadment, we are not concerned with it and the said parties are liberty to pursue the remedies prescribed in with law whether it be under civil or criminal law, but, so far as the official opposite parties are concerned, if they in any manner propose to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over any land or house, then, they will have to follow the law of the land. If any demolition is proposed, then, statutory provisions and the pronouncement of the Hon'ble the Supreme Court vide judgment dated 13.11.2024 rendered in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 295 of 2022; IN RE: DIRECTIONS IN THE MATTER OF DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES will have to be adhered. 9. The writ petition is disposed of.
[Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 28.7.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench