Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44023 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5897 of 2025 Applicant :- Narendra Pratap Singh Alias Pintu And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Anurag Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Hansraj, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Saurabh Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ishan Bhasin, learned counsel for opposite party No.2, who has filed the Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party No.2, which is taken on record. 2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicants have sought quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.5850 of 2021, arising out of Case Crime No.883 of 2019, under Sections 323, 386, 452, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District-Barabanki and cognizance order dated 03.06.2021 as well as charge-sheet No.725 of 2019. 3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that they have settled their dispute amicably outside the Court and they have arrived at the compromise. Compromise entered into between the parties have been placed on record at Page No.45 of the petition. The parties have confirmed the terms of the compromise. Compromise has been verified between the parties by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 18, Barabanki, vide order dated 30.05.2025 in compliance of the order dated 23.08.2023 passed by this Court in Application u/s 482 No. 7793 of 2023. 4. Opposite party No.2 does not have any objection, if the impugned proceedings are quashed against the applicants. 5. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. 6. Considering the fact that the dispute between the parties is personal in nature and ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of B. S. Joshi and others versus State of Haryana and another :(2003) 4 SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant versus C.B.I. and another : (2008) 9 SCC 677, Manoj Sharma versus State and others : (2008) 16 SCC 1, Gian Singh versus Station of Punjab: (2010) 15 SCC 118 and Narinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another: (2014) 6 SCC 466, it would be appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case to quash the criminal proceedings as continuance of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. 7. In view of the fact that the parties have settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise arrived at between the parties and law laid down by the Supreme Court of India, the present application is allowed and proceedings of Criminal Case No.5850 of 2021, arising out of Case Crime No.883 of 2019, under Sections 323, 386, 452, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District-Barabanki and cognizance order dated 03.06.2021 as well as charge-sheet No.725 of 2019 are quashed. Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Vinay/- Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench