[2025:RJ-JP:28729] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5079/2025 Kalulal @ Kamal S/o Laturlal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Kanwadiya, Police Station Mothpur, District Baran (Raj.) (Presently Accused Confined In District Jail Jhalawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8308/2025 Shahrukh Khan Alias Raja S/o Abdul Salim, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dahikheda Police Station Aklera At Present Tower Ke Pass Nai Basti Aklera Police Station Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8433/2025 Ravi Jatav @ Ravi Yadav S/o Goverdhan Jatav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ramnagar Tanki Mohalla Aklera Police Station Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9138/2025 Rakesh Kumar @ Raju S/o Bhuralal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Maanpura Gujraan Police Station Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP [2025:RJ-JP:28729] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-5079/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/07/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.456/2024 registered at Police Station Aklera, District Jhalawar for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 386 & 389 of IPC. Presently, investigation is being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 386, 364A, 368 & 389/120B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that other co-accused persons have been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Counsel submit that petitioners are in custody since long and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. He submits that except petitioner Ravi Jatav, all petitioners are habitual offenders as number of cases have been registered against them. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; especially considering the argument advanced by learned counsel for petitioners, as also the fact that other co- accused persons have been enlarged on bail by this Court as well as Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, but without commenting [2025:RJ-JP:28729] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-5079/2025] anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Kalulal @ Kamal S/o Laturlal, (2) Shahrukh Khan Alias Raja S/o Abdul Salim, (3) Ravi Jatav @ Ravi Yadav S/o Goverdhan Jatav, and (4) Rakesh Kumar @ Raju S/o Bhuralal, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and except petitioner Ravi Jatav, all other petitioners shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the [2025:RJ-JP:28729] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-5079/2025] concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 10. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 11. The observations made hereinabove is only for the decision of these bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /93-96