Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44161 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6896 of 2025 Petitioner :- Surya Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Tiwari Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Heard Sri Vivek Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.3 despite the notice being served, as is indicated in the notice which bears the signature of the respondent No.3. Considering the fact that the daughter of the petitioner has been admitted with the respondent No.3 in terms of the provisions contained under the Act, the writ petition is allowed. The respondent No.3 is directed to ensure that the daughter of the petitioner, namely, Suryanshi Singh is admitted with it. In case the respondent No.3 does not permit the student to attend the classes, the B.S.A. would be entitled to cancel the affiliation of the respondent No.3 in accordance with law. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench