1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8758 of 2025 Date of decision: 04.06.2025 Jharku Mal. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner has preferred a representation on 25.12.2024 (Annexure P-8) to respondent No.2. Petitioner’s grievance is that aforesaid representation has not been decided by respondent No.2/competent authority till date. 3. Looking to the nature of the grievance raised in this writ petition, it would in the interest of justice to direct respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation (Annexure P-8) of the petitioner -2- afresh, notwithstanding office order dated 27.11.2018 (Annexure P-5), in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 4th June, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)