Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15247 (AP)

BHUPATHI RAJU JAI VINEEL VARMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/4111/2025 · 2025-06-04

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4111 OF 2025 Between: Bhupathi Raju Jai Vineel Varma, C/o. Siva Rama Raju, Aged about 36, Occ Private Employee, / R/o. D.No. 1-69, BramhamGari Street, Bhimavaram Mandal, Rayalam District, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER/A.1 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Amaravathi. nd 2. Galla Aparna, D/o. Ramarao, Aged 32 years, R/o. D.No. 18-4-53, 2 lane, Kedareswarapet, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh. (Respondent No.2 is Impleaded as per the court order dated 22.05.2025 in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in Crl.P.No.4111 of 2025) ...Respondent No.2/De-facto Complainant Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.38 7 of 2025 punishable under Sections 64(2){m), 115(2),351 (2),BNS and section 3(2) (v) of the SC & ST (POA) Act. 1989 on the file of S.N. Puram Police Station, Vijayawada. s Ttus-P^tition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Gfaunds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri UMESH CHANDRA P V G, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following Order: APHC010193822025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4111/2025 Between; Bhupathi Rsju Jai Vineel Varma ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.UMESH CHANDRA PVG Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S); 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present criminal petition. 1. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to avail remedies available under law. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S N OFFICER To, 1. The Station House Officer, Satyanarayanapuram Vijayawada City. 2. One CC to SRI. UMESH CHANDRA P V G Advocate 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra 4. Three CD Copies Police Station [OPUC] Pradesh. [OUT] Pmg vna HIGH COURT DATED:05/06/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.4111 of 2025 dismissing the crlp as withdrawn