Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 152456 (ALL)

SURESH KUMAR AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/7901/2025 · 2025-07-22

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41721 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7901 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suresh Kumar And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Anzar Husain,Faisal Husain Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned to decide the representation with regard to proper fixation of pay as per their cadre and post and conferment service benefits. 3. It is submitted that there was certain service disputes pertaining to petitioners' service along with other similarly situated persons which has been adjudicated upon in various other judgments and petitioners are seeking similar benefits. 4. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh representation before opposite party no.4-Director Secondary Education Camp Office Park Road, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of representation of petitioners along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench