RAJ KUMAR (PNO-892411540) AND 24 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/8012/2025 · 2025-07-23
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42120 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8012 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Kumar (Pno-892411540) And 24 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to take into consideration the service period spent by petitioners while undergoing training prior to appointment as Constables and for counting of 19 years of service for granting one additional increment in accordance with Government Order dated
02.12.2000.
3. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representation before opposite party no.3-Deputy Inspector General of Police (Establishment) Police Headquarter, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. Order Date :- 23.7.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench