SARVADEV SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/4329/2025 · 2025-07-22
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152427 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152427 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41975 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4329 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sarvadev Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide recall application of partition suit case No. RST/2667/2025, Computerized Case No. T-202504680902667 (Sarvadev Shukla Vs. Dudhnath & others), (Old Computerized Case No. T202104680902283), U/S 116 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Sub-Divisional Officer, Tahsil Baidirai, District Sultanpur, is directed to decide recall application of partition suit case No. RST/2667/2025, Computerized Case No. T-202504680902667 (Sarvadev Shukla Vs. Dudhnath & others), (Old Computerized Case No. T202104680902283), U/S 116 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment
shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench