SHIVRAJ MALOJIRAO TONDCHIRKAR v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL UDGIR, THR ITS CHIEF OFFICER, AT AND POST UDGIR
CP/401/2024 · 2025-01-10
Shri Neeraj P Dhote, Shri R G Avachat
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15242 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15242 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
969 CONT. PETITION NO. 401 OF 2024 IN WP/12753/2023 Shivraj Malojirao Tondchirkar ..Petitioner Versus Municipal Council Udgir, Through Its Chief Officer, At and Post Udgir ..Respondent ….. Shri. P. G. Godhamgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner Shri. Parikshit S. Mantri h/f. Shri. Parag V. Barde, Advocate for Respondent No.1 …..
CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
Dated : JANUARY 10, 2025 PER COURT :- . Heard.
2. This Contempt Petition is filed for non compliance of the Order dated 16.10.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.12753 of 2023 by which the following directions were issued.
“3. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off with a direction to the Municipal Council to look into the grievance voiced by the Petitioner and deal with the same strictly in accordance with law, as is applicable, within a period of sixty days from today.”
3. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner has filed Rejoinder to the Affidavit-in-reply filed by the Municipal Council. The Rejoinder is taken on record and marked as ‘X-1’ for the purpose of identification.
4. The learned Advocate for Respondent No.1 – Municipal Council submits that the Chief Officer of Municipal Council has filed 2025:BHC-AUG:1044-DB
2 Affidavit-in-reply tendering his unconditional apology and further stating that the Petitioner’s grievance was looked into and appropriate action has been taken. In paragraph no.4 of the Affidavit-in-reply, it is stated that, the order has been duly complied with and the grievance raised by the Petitioner does not survive.
5. Though the Petitioner has filed the Rejoinder raising disputed factual position, it is needless to state that this Court in Contempt Petition cannot go beyond order.
6. Since the order dated 16.10.2023 passed in Writ Petition No.12753 of 2023 has been complied with, nothing survives for
consideration in the Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of.
( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. ) ( R. G. AVACHAT, J. ) GGP Signed by: Gajanan G. Punde Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 15/01/2025 11:30:34