SUKHRAM v. BAR COUNSEL OF U.P. 19 MAHARSHI DAYANAND MARGE PRAYAGRAJ THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/6876/2025 · 2025-07-23
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152417 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152417 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42176-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6876 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sukhram Respondent :- Bar Counsel Of U.P. 19 Maharshi Dayanand Marge Prayagraj Thru. Chairman And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Nishad,Rajesh Kumar Dhuriya Counsel for Respondent :- Subhash Chandra Pandey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Shri Vijai Kumar Shukla, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 6. The same is taken on record. Heard Shri Anil Kumar Nishad, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Subhash Chandra Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1 and Shri Vijai Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 6. The petitioner claiming to be an Advocate and Member of the Rudauli Bar Association, Tehsil- Rudauli District- Ayodhya is aggrieved by certain notices and orders by which his membership has been suspended for six months. The Bar Association is a Society. The remedy, if there is a cause, is before the Deputy Registrar or before the Civil Court, as the case may be and not under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the facts of this case. With aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 23.7.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench