IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP (M) No.1289/2025. Date of Decision: 24th July, 2025. Sumit @ Shanky .....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …..Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Deeksha Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. R.K. Negi, Adl. Advocate General. ASI Ranjit Singh, IO, PS Dharampur, District Solan, HP, is present in person. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral). Learned Addl. Advocate General has filed a fresh status report. The same is taken on record. Copy whereof has been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. From a perusal of the same, it is evident that in the case at hand, only three witnesses are to be examined and for examination of the three witnesses, in the trial, the mater is now coming up on 24.08.2025. The three witnesses to be examined include the Investigating Officer and two PWs (No.1 and 4), who are stated to be the Doctors, who have given medical opinion, in the case. 3. Since the trial, in the case at hand, is on the verge of conclusion, therefore, the present petition is dismissed, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 24th July, 2025 (Gaurav Rawat) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?