Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 152340 (MAD)

J. Selvi v. The State of TamilNadu Rep.by

CRL OP(MD)/12490/2025 · 2025-07-24

B Pugalendhi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD) No. 12490 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CRL OP(MD) No. 12490 of 2025 1. J. Selvi W/o.Jeyabal, No.3/14, Vallkulathu Palayam, Athu Palayam (Post), Pugalur Taluk, Karur District Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by The Superintendent of Police, Karur, Karur District 2.The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District 3.Suresh S/o.Not Known, Velayuthampalayam, pugalur Taluk, Karur District 4.Rani W/o.Not Known, Velayuthampalayam, pugalur Taluk, Karur District Respondent(s) PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to issue suitable directions to the 1st and 2nd respondent police not to harass the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): M/s. Lenin. R For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl Side) for R1 and R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD) No. 12490 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner has approached this court that the respondent police are harassing her based on the complaint of the 3rd respondent in a money transaction. 2.The learned Counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is a member of the chit conducted by the 3rd respondent and she has taken the bid and received money from him. Based on the complaint of the 3rd respondent, the police are harassing her in the money dispute. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) appearing for the respondent police submits that the petitioner has availed Rs.61,400/- through bid in the chit conducted by the 3rd respondent and has failed to repay the same. Therefore, the 3rd respondent lodged a complaint. They have not entertained the petition of the 3rd respondent. In the meantime the petitioner has lodged a complaint against the 3rd respondent and it is enquired in CSR No.332 of 2025. 4.This Court considered the rival submissions made. 5.The petitioner has approached this court that the respondent police are harassing her based on the complaint of 3rd respondent. According to the learned Government Advocate they are not entertaining the complaint of the 3rd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD) No. 12490 of 2025 respondent, however, the petitioner's complaint has been enquired in CSR No. 332 of 2025. 6.Recording the above submission, this petition is closed. 24-07-2025 DSK Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD) No. 12490 of 2025 To 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by The Superintendent of Police, Karur, Karur District 2.The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District 3.Suresh S/o.Not Known, Velayuthampalayam, pugalur Taluk, Karur District 4.Rani W/o.Not Known, Velayuthampalayam, pugalur Taluk, Karur District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD) No. 12490 of 2025 B.PUGALENDHI J. DSK CRL OP(MD) No. 12490 of 2025 24-07-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis