Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15233 (KAR)

R. PRASAD v. RAJATH DWARKA

CRL.P/1775/2023 · 2025-06-30

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23062 CRL.P No. 1775 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1775 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: R. PRASAD S/O LATE RAMPRASAD (CORRECT NAME IS RAMDAS) AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/A NO.1880, 10TH MAIN ROAD 2ND STAGE KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT BENGALURU-560078 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIVEK A R, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: RAJATH DWARKA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O LATE MUNIRATHNAM NAIDU PRESENTLY R/A NO.2062, 7TH MAIN 2ND STAGE, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT BENGALURU-560078 …RESPONDENT (NIL) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO A. QUASH THE ORDER DATED 06.01.2023 PASSED BY THE 16th ACMM, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.221/2021 ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23062 CRL.P No. 1775 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. On 16.12.2024, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if office objections are not complied within 10 days, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of petition. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11