Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15232 (AP)

The Commissioner, v. Tatakula Lalitha Rani,

AS/387/2024 · 2025-06-24

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010193082024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRUUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 387 OF 2024 Appeal Under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 13.10.2023 in QS. No. 325 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the XII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada Between: !. . /'l 1. The Commissioner, Vijayawada||/lMnicipar^^C^ Vijayawada. 2. The Mayor, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada. 3. The Director, District Sports'Authority, Krishna District. i: K. Appellants/Defendants No.1 to 3 AND 1. Tatakula Lalitha Rani, W/o. Ravi |<umar, aged about 45 years, R/o. D.No. 4- 33-39, Bhimanavaripet, Opposite Milk Project Quarters, Vijayawada, charge; Vijayawada Municipal: Corporation,^ C^^^ oor St M.G.Road, Vijayawada. ■ In Charge, yMC Zifnkhana Swimrhing isi 2. Z Srinivas, Sports in Dandamudi Rajagopala Rao 3. Mr Simhachalam, aged 53 years Pool, Gandhi Nagar, Vijayawada. ■i t ' 'a^iMI'S i < 4. Ravi Kiran, Aged 38 years, Swimming Coach at VMC Zirnkhana Swimming Pool, Gandhi Nagar, Vijayawada. r-n' Respondents/Defendants No.4 to 6 (Respondents No.2 to 4 are not necessary parties to this Appeal) lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CRG praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 100 days in preferring the above appeal lA NO: 2 OF 2024 m U > Vy: I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppprt of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the execution of the Judgment and decree dated 13.10.2023 in O.S'Ko. 325 of 2015 on the file of XII Addl. District Judge, Vijayawada pending disposal of the above first appeal Counsel for the Appellants: SRI BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent No.1 :'SRI M KARIBASAIAH The Court made the following order: Judgment j- i i y •% >v kV APHC010193082024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 387/2024 Between: ...APPELLANT(S) The Commissioner, and Others AND ...RESPONDENT(S) Tatakula Lalitha Rani and Others Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.M KARIBASAIAH The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 387/2024 JUDGMENT: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J) I This appeal was filed by defendant Nos.1 to 3 in O.S.No.325 of 2015 \ challenging the decree passed in favour of plaintiff/respondent dated 13.10.2023 by learned XII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada. The appeal was filed along with the application for condonation of delay. During the pendency of the said application, Sri P.D.Mahindra, learned 2. counsel representing learned counsel for the appellants submits that decree has been executed. The appellants have paid the amount under the decree which the plaintiff have also withdrawn. He prays that this appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. Learned counsel for the appellants further submits that memo to that effect has also been filed today itself by the appellants vide U.S.R.No.60447 of 2025. A copy of the same has been placed before us. Let the said memo vide U.S.R.No.60447 of 2025 be placed on record. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the submission 4. made by learned counsel for the appellants. Recording the said submissions, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as 5. withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also ^ stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTloi^FFIC^ER / To, 1. The XII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada 2. One CC to SRI BALAJI MEDAMALLI, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI M KARIBASAIAH, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of A.P. at Amsifavathi. 5. Tvyo CD Copies •J .i •/ •^1 HIGH COURT DATED: 25/06/2025 ■J' '4 % ” V. i-: '■f '■li '-V I\V ( if-: ■f: ■ft 'h -P' ' <?• r- 'I s. '} ;•!; 4: -1, •/, ORDER i ‘‘y <■ AS NO. 387 OF 2024 ■J" 'a: O^AN*^ o f i: i. <r» 2 2 SEP 2025 1 ^^^41flfr»ntSectiop>>^ rrt V’; es c9 A; ■'4' ,•/ DISMISSING THE A S AS WITHDRAWN j: