AGRA SAHKARI AWAS SAMITI THRU. SECRETARY RAJ KISHORE SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. CO-OPERATIVE DEPTT. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/6892/2025 · 2025-07-23
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152254 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152254 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42127-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6892 of 2025 Petitioner :- Agra Sahkari Awas Samiti Thru. Secretary Raj Kishore Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Co-Operative Deptt. Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Pratap Singh Vatsa Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Shri Girijesh Pandey, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party- Agra Development Authority. The same is taken on record. Heard Shri Ajay Pratap Singh Vatsa, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rajbaksh Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Shri Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 4 and 5 and Shri Girijesh Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 6. The petitioner- Co-operative Society has a grievance against the Agra Development Authority to the effect that persons who are not members of the Co-operative Society they are submitting applications for sanction of Map for construction of houses on the land of the Society which are being sanctioned by the Agra Development Authority. Hence, the representation has been made to the opposite party no. 1 raising a grievance in the matter. It is said that the said representation is referable to Section 41(1). The petitioner may approach the Agra Development Authority concerned or the opposite party no. 1 who may get the facts verified if there is a cause. We make it clear that so far as membership dispute is concerned, that can not be looked into by the opposite party no. 1 or the Development Authority, for that the remedy is elsewhere, but, if there is any other grievance against Development Authority that can be looked into by aforesaid if otherwise permissible in law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is
disposed of. . (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 23.7.2025/R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench