SAMPURNANAND ALIAS POORAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 14 OTHERS
WRIC/6858/2025 · 2025-07-21
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152250 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152250 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41498-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6858 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sampurnanand Alias Pooran And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vaibhav Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. The petitioners claim to be patta holders of some land since
1982. Proceedings for cancellation of the said pattas was initiated and the pattas were cancelled vide order dated
11.06.1992. A writ petition bearing Writ C No. 1000530 of 1999 was filed in which the petitioners herein claimed to have been the petitioners, though, learned Counsel is not able to demonstrate the said fact. The said petition was allowed and the cancellation order dated 11.06.1992 was set aside, so was the appellate / revisional order dated 17.11.1998. However, the petitioners say that they are not in possession and hence this petition seeking possession. We cannot go into such questions of possession under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, especially as, the petitioner's Counsel was not able to demonstrate as to when the petitioners were dispossessed. The petitioners may avail other remedies as may be prescribed in law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench