Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 152231 (ALL)

RAM BAHAL v. MAHIMA MISHRA, TAHSILDAR, TAHSIL RAMSANEHI GHAT, BARABANKI

CAPL/2201/2025 · 2025-08-22

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49532 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2201 of 2025 Applicant :- Ram Bahal Opposite Party :- Mahima Mishra, Tahsildar, Tahsil Ramsanehi Ghat, Barabanki Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Singh Chauhan,Ananya Singh Chauhan,Shameem Jahan,Shashwat Pratap Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Short counter affidavit alongwith an application for discharge of contempt notice has been filed by the respondent, which is taken on record. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the proceedings Under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 were initiated by registering 7 cases and all 7 cases have been decided. In 3 cases after the order passed under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the encroachments have been removed and in 4 cases appeals have been been preferred, so the encroachment could not be removed, as such the judgement and order passed by the writ court has been complied with. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgement and order dated 15.01.2025 passed in Writ-C No.85 of 2025 has been complied with and now nothing remains to be adjudicated by this Court, hence the present contempt application has become infructuous and prayed that the same may be dismissed as infructuous. As such, the present contempt application/ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The notice issued against the respondent is hereby discharged. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench