Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 152214 (ALL)

SMT. TABASSUM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/6500/2025 · 2025-07-23

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42220-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6500 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Tabassum Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankit Kumar Trivedi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. who appears for the respondent nos.1 to 3. 2. For the orders proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main prayer:- "i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties No. 2 and 3 to conduct fair investigation in pursuant to the FIR dated 03/02/2025 registered as FIR No. 0018/2025, under sections 498A, 323, 506 of IPC, at Police Station Madeyganj, District- Lucknow Central, (contained in Annexure No. 3) to the writ petitiones well as directing them to make effective investigation to find brother of the petitioner. ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties No. 2 and 3 to conclude the investigation in the FIR dated 03/02/2025 registered as FIR No. 0018/2025, under sections 498A, 323, 506 of IPC, at Police Station -Madeyganj, District- Lucknow Central, contained in Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition, within stipulated period of time.." 4. Learned A.G.A. has produced before this Court the instruction sent by Savita, Sub Inspector Police Station -Madeyganj, District- Lucknow wherein it has been stated that the investigation has been concluded on 18.5.2025 and the charge sheet has been sent to the Supervisory Authority. . 5. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate court in view of observation made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, in case any grievance of the petitioner is un- redressed. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Order Date :- 23.7.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench