Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 152194 (MAD)

A. Mari v. The District Collector

WP Crl.(MD)/628/2025 · 2025-07-29

B Pugalendhi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.628 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.07.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.628 of 2025 A.Mari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, R.S.Mangalam Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Taluk Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. 6.Ramanathan 7.Chinnathambi 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.628 of 2025 8.Thoondiyappa 9.Vicky 10.Muniyaraj 11.Saravanaselvan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to ensure that the petitioner is participated in the temple festival of Arulmigu Jega Mariyamman Temple scheduled to be held on 29.07.2025 and ensure his right of worshipping of ‘Arulmigu Jega Mariyamman Temple’ situated at Ayingudi village, R.S.Mangalam Taluk, Ramanthapuram District and further take necessary action against the respondents 6 to 11 for imposing social boycatt on the petitioner, by considering his representation dated 16.07.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Malaimaran For R1 & R2 : Mr.F.Deepak, Special Government Pleader. For R3 to R5 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.628 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner with a grievance that he has been ex- communicating from the village and has been prevented from participating in the temple village, has filed this petition. 2.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 & 2, on instructions, submits that after complaint of this petitioner, they have conducted enquiry and the parties have amicably solved the issue and there is no discrimination in the village and they have also given a statement that they will celebrate the festival jointly. 3.Recording the above submission, this writ petition is closed. The fourth respondent shall ensure that everyone is participating in the temple festival. No costs. 29.07.2025 gns 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.628 of 2025 To 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, R.S.Mangalam Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Taluk Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. 6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.628 of 2025 B.PUGALENDHI, J. gns W.P.Crl.(MD)No.628 of 2025 29.07.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis