2025:CGHC:37281 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2977 of 2021 1 - Suresh Kumar Jatwar S/o Kusu Lal Jatwar Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Belha (Kharod), P.S. Shivrinarayan, Tahsil Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Police Headquarters, Sector- 19, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar. Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Assistant Inspector General Of Police (Selection) Office Of The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters, Sector- 19, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar. Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Inspector General Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Superintendent Of Police Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : None. For State : Mr. Kalpesh Rupparel, Panel Lawyer KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Digitally signed by KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Date: 2025.08.01 17:41:21 +0530 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 30.07.2025 1. Learned counsel for the State would submit that the selection process has been concluded and the petitioner has participated in the selection process without any objection, therefore, the petition has become infructuous. 2. Considering the submission and also considering the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even when the matter is called twice, probably, since the selection process has been concluded and he has participated in the selection process, he may not be interested to continue with the proceedings. 3. This Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition which has rendered infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition(s) is dismissed having become infructuous. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Deshmukh