MOHAMMAD TARIQUE v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/4270/2025 · 2025-07-18
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152162 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152162 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41410
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4270 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad Tarique Respondent :- Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 -Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide Revision No.1971/2018, computerized case No.C-201804000001971, (Ansar Ahmad and others Vs. Akeel Ahmad and others) under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is
directed to decide Revision No.1971/2018, computerized case No.C-201804000001971, (Ansar Ahmad and others Vs. Akeel Ahmad and others) under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned , if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 18.7.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench