Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Dat e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
2025:UHC:11659-DB
FA No.96 of 2021 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the appellant.
2. Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. The instant appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 07.09.2021 passed by the court of learned Judge Family Court, Haridwar in Original Case No.299 of 2017 Sharad Sharma vs. Pooja Sharma, by which the petition for divorce filed by the appellant has been rejected.
4. Heard.
5. Today, learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondent – Pooja Sharma has passed away. This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant. Since the respondent has died, nothing survives in this appeal.
6. Accordingly, the present appeal stands disposed of.
(Ashish Naithani, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 30.12.2025 Nitesh/Akash