Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15214 (JHR)

MD MOHSIM ANSARI ALIAS MOHSIN ANSARI ALIAS MOHSIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4840/2025 · 2025-06-19

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:16157] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4840 of 2025 ------ 1. Md. Mohsim Ansari @ Mohsin Ansari @ Mohsin, aged about 20 years. 2. Wasim Ansari @ Osim Ansari @ Wasim, aged about 19 years. Both are sons of Sajid Ansari, resident of Village Nagadari, P.O. Baskupi, P.S. Karon, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 19-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection Karon P.S. Case No.23 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 191 (2), 191 (3), 190, 127 (2), 132, 121 (1), 121 (2), 262, 263, 109, 351 (3) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, voluntarily used criminal force, assaulted and caused hurt to the public servant in discharging their duty; who went to investigate a cyber-crime and attempted to commit their murder. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false and general and omnibus in nature. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-12 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been implicated in this case only because of village politics. It is next submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. It is also submitted that three co-accused, with similar allegations, have already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 09.06.2025 passed in B.A. No.3845 of 2025 and other four co-accused persons have been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by different co- ordinate Benches of this Court. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 15.04.2025 as is evident from para-15 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Madhupur in connection with Karon P.S. Case No.23 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/