Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 152095 (ALL)

MATA PRASAD v. COMMISSIONER/CHARMAN, L.D.A. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/6837/2025 · 2025-07-24

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42623-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6837 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mata Prasad Respondent :- Commissioner/Charman, L.D.A. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gopesh Tripathi,Devendra Pratap Singh Kamal,Hrishabh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Mr. Anagh Shukla, learned Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of Lucknow Development Authority which is taken on record. 2. Heard. 3. After arguing the matter at some length ultimately the petitioner's counsel informed the Court that after demolition of the building existing on the land in question which in fact belongs to petitioner, the opposite party no. 7, who according to him, was a tenant of the petitioner is undertaking fresh construction without getting a map sanctioned. A civil suit is also pending between petitioner and opposite party no. 7, a private party. 4. If the construction is being undertaken without getting the map sanctioned, then, the petitioner can inform the Lucknow Development Authority or the Lucknow Development Authority which is a party can itself take cognizance of the matter and do the needful as per law. 5. Petitioner is at liberty to pursue the suit against opposite party no. 7, if otherwise permissible in law. 6. The writ petition is disposed of. [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench