DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE , LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
WPIL/724/2025 · 2025-07-24
Arun Bhansali, Jaspreet Singh
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152084 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152084 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42575-DB Chief Justice's Court Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 724 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Rajendra Prasad Singh and 4 others Respondent :- State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue, Lucknow and others Counsel for Petitioner :- Opendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Pankaj Singh (A.C.S.C.), Mohan Singh Hon'ble Arun Bhansali,Chief Justice Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
1. The petition has been filed purportedly in public interest seeking direction to the respondents to restore, maintain, take measures for beautification and make useful to public and animals of the alleged undeveloped pond identified at Khasara No. 830, area 0.0630 Hectare in the revenue Map of Village- Gajendrapur, Karaundikala, Kadipur, Sultanpur.
2. Submissions have been made that despite repeated representations made in this regard, the respondents have not taken any care of the pond in question and therefore, the respondents be directed to do the needful.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents points out the communication dated 06.11.2024 (Annexure 6 to the writ petition), wherein it has been indicated by the District Panchayat Raj Officer that presently the pond in question is not included in the annual work plan and for Financial Year 2025- 26, the same would be included in the MGNREGA Scheme and thereafter the needful would be done.
4. Counsel for the respondents also, on instructions, made
submissions that the needful would be done by the respondents
with priority and expedition.
5. In the circumstances of the case, wherein the respondents, based on their communication dated 06.11.2024 and the instructions, have submitted that the needful would be given priority and would be done with expedition, no further directions are required to be issued.
6. It is expected of the respondents to do needful with requisite priority and expedition.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 24.7.2025 P.Sri./Arvind (Jaspreet Singh, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ) Digitally signed by :- PUNEET SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench