Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15208 (GAU)

RAUNAK HUSSAIN v. NARAYAN KONWAR AND 2 ORS

Cont.Cas(C)/407/2023 · 2025-06-10

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010142512023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/407/2023 RAUNAK HUSSAIN S/O MD. HAFIZ, R/O DIGBOI TOWN, P.O.-DIGBOI, P.S.-DIGBOI, DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM VERSUS NARAYAN KONWAR AND 2 ORS THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION, ELEMENTARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:SMT. SURANJANA SENAPATI THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-781019 3:BITUPAN HAZARIKA DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION TINSUKIA DIST-TINSUKIA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. Y S MANNAN, MS N DEKARAJA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R2), MR. P K BORAH,MR S M T CHISTIE,MR. D SAIKIA,MR. P K BORAH (R2),MR. U SARMA (R2) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 11.06.2025 Heard Shri Y.S. Mannan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Borah, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has however submitted that during the pendency of this contempt petition, an order has been passed by the Department on 10.06.2025. He submits that the direction of this Court has been complied with. Let a copy of this order be furnished to Shri Mannan, the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid development, this Court is of the opinion that the present contempt petition is not required to be continued any further and the same is accordingly closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum, in case there is any grievance with the order mentioned above. JUDGE Comparing Assistant