UPENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. PANCHAYATIRAJ LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/6809/2025 · 2025-07-28
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152073 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 152073 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43240-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6809 of 2025 Petitioner :- Upendra Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Panchayatiraj Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brij Bhushan Singh,Pranjal Apurva,Sandeep Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard Shri Brij Bhushan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Akansha Dubey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. Proceedings were initiated against the petitioner under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, wherein, orders were passed for removal of entrancement. Being aggrieved the petitioner filed an appeal before the Collector, Ambedkar Nagar which has been rejected. Those orders have not been challenged herein instead a writ of mandamus has been sought as under:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the concerned authorities to consider petitioner's claim over the property and restrain opposite party to evict the petitioner from the said land in pursuance to the order of district magistrate." The writ petition is absolutely misconceived. The writ petition is disposed of without interfering in the matter with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedies prescribed if otherwise permissible in law. . (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 28.7.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench