Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15200 (UTT)

MOHD TASNEEM ANSARI v. KUNDAN SINGH

WPMS/2905/2025 · 2025-11-06

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:9791 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.2905 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Aarushi Batra, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned counsel submits that he has got instruction to appear on behalf of respondent. He prays for and is granted 48 hrs. time to file Vakalatnama. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made a statement at Bar that she wants to withdraw the present writ petition for the reason that cause of action for filing the instant writ petition does not survive. 4. The prayer, so made, is granted. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.11.2025 PN