Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15200 (JK)

IMRAN MATTOO v. AMITAVA CHATTERJEE AND ANR

CCP(D)/35/2025 · 2025-11-06

Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No.1 REGULAR CAUSE LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(D) 35/2025 In [LPA 205/2024] Imran Mattoo …Petition(s) Through: Mr. G.A. Lone, Advocate Mr. N.A. Baba, Advocate & Vs. Amitava Chatterjee and Anr. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T.H. Khawaja, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Imam Abdul Muizz, Advocate & Mr. Naseer Ul Akbar, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 06.11.2025 1. This contempt petition by the petitioner is for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents for willful disobedience and non-compliance of an interim order dated 23rd August, 2024 passed in LPA No. 205/2024, whereby a direction was issued to the respondents to review the sealed cover procedure adopted in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents states at the Bar that in compliance with the aforesaid order dated 23rd August, 2024 the sealed cover procedure adopted has been duly reviewed and the benefit of promotion has been given to those who have been held entitled to such promotion. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the proceedings in this contempt petition are closed. 4. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner is not satisfied with the relief granted by the respondents upon opening of the sealed cover, he shall be at liberty to work out the remedies as may be available to him under law, and the closure of this contempt petition shall not preclude him from doing so. (SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR: 06.11.2025 “Mir Arif”