Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15200 (AP)

PALADUGU VENKATESWARA RAO v. GINJUPALLI SAMBAIAH

CRP/850/2022 · 2025-07-08

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010191812022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 850/2022 Between: 1. PALADUGU VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O PARASURAMAIAH,HINDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O VUYYUR, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GINJUPALLI SAMBAIAH, S/o Ankamma, Hindu, aged about 64 years, Occ. Business, R/o Dharani Homes, 3/10, Vidya Nagar, Guntur. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toTo set aside the order, dated 18.01.2022 passed in IA No. 389/2019 in OS. No. 668/2016 on the file of the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge at Guntur and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay all further proceedings in OS. No. 668/2016 on the file of the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge at Guntur and to pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to extend the interim order grated in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in CRP No. 850 of 2022, dt.28-04-2022 by this Hon'ble Court and pass such other order or orders as it may IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order granted in I.A.No. 1 of 2022 in CRP.No.850 of 2022 dated 28-04-2022 and dismiss the main CRP and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISHNA KISHORE BHATRAJU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO The Court made the following: The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. 2. It is represented by the learned counsel for the respondents that the main suit in O.S.No.668 of 2016 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur was dismissed by judgment and decree dated 22.02.2024. 3. In view of the same, the cause in the present civil revision petition does not survive. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR 09.07.2025 LSP 58 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 850/2022 09.07.2025 LSP