Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15197 (JK)

MUSHTAQ AHMAD SHAH v. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS

CRMC/121/2018 · 2025-12-20

Sanjay Parihar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 05 SUPPLEMENTARY LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRMC 121/2018 MUSHTAQ AHMAD SHAH …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Zahid Kais Noor, GA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 20.12.2025 1. Nemo for petitioner. 2. I.O. Ghulam Nabi, Head Constable, P/S Kulgam present and produced case diaries as well as the FSL report. In terms whereof, the income certificate issued by Tehsildar, Kulgam is said to have been a false document and the FSL report affirms the commission of act of forgery and making of false document. 3. The petitioner has not been appearing in the case whereas in terms of case FIR No. 63/2018, petitioner is accused of commission of offences u/s 420, 467 and 468 RPC and initially at the time of admission of the petition for quashment vide order dated 06-04-2018, the proceedings in the FIR were stayed. Subsequently, the same was modified on 21-02-2022 by providing that the investigation shall proceed, however, upon completion of the same, in the event charge- sheet is contemplated, that shall await the nod of this Court. The investigation is over as well as the Forensic Report has been obtained, thus the challan is ready to be filed before the Court of law. The petitioner appears to have lost interest in the present proceeding that is why he is not appearing for the hearing. Today also none appears for the petitioner. It is thus apparent that in view of the forensic report pointing out making of false document which has resulted into completion of investigation in FIR No. 63/2018. The petitioner appears to have known the fate of the petition. 4. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for want of prosecution enabling the Police agency to file the charge-sheet before the Court of law. 5. Case Diary is returned to the I.O whereas the Forensic Report dated 22-10-2024 shall form part of the record. 6. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 20.12.2025 Akhil Dev