HARIOM KASHYAP ALIAS HARI OM v. DISTT. MAGISTRATE BARABANKI AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/6822/2025 · 2025-07-28
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43224-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6822 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hariom Kashyap Alias Hari Om Respondent :- Distt. Magistrate Barabanki And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ambrish Kumar Dubey,Naqibullah Khan,Seema Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard Ms. Seem Kashyap, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Manish Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner wants construction of some interlocking which is not being undertaking on account of a dispute which has also led to lodging of an F.I.R. These are not matters to be interfered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, especially as, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel says that any attempt to get such interlocking constructed results in a law and order situation. The petitioner may approach the concerned authorities who may look into the matter. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is
disposed of. . (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 28.7.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench