Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15196 (JHR)

INTAJ MIYAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3104/2025 · 2025-06-05

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14595 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3104 of 2025 1. Intaj Miyan, S/o Sohrab Miyan, aged about 41 years 2. Manirudiin Ansari @ Mokarram Ansari, s/o Islam Miyan, aged about 29 years 3. Sohel Ansari, S/o Atauddin Ansari, aged about 23 years 4. Md. Taksim Anasari @ Taksim Shekh, s/o Sikandar Ansari, aged about 29 years 5. Manovar Ansari @ Maunir Ansari, s/o Hasil Ansari, aged about 28 years 6. Arshad Ansari, s/o Md. Noushad, aged about 20 years, All are resident of village – Pindari, PO – Gopibandh, PS – Sarath, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … …. Opp. Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioners : Mr. Shahid Yunus, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mahua Palit, APP ------ Order No. 03 / Dated : 05.06.2025. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sarath P.S. Case No. 17/2025 for the offences registered under Sections 190, 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 121(1), 125(b), 132, 109, 351(2), 352 and 324(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no any specific allegation against the petitioners of pelting stone over the said vehicle. He lastly submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent and the allegations made against them are general and omnibus and they have no concern with the alleged offence as the petitioners are daily wages worker and on very same day they were not present there. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioners, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and the learned court below on their surrender shall release them on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Madhupur in connection with Sarath P.S. Case No. 17/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 6. It is made clear that the petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation/trial and if the petitioners will not cooperate in the investigation/trial, the State would be at liberty to take appropriate action. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Sangam/ -