2025:UHC:10129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHISH NAITHANI 15th November, 2025 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO.1358 of 2025 Rajesh Singh …Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Vinod Sharma and Mr. Kamlesh Budhlakoti, learned counsel. Counsel for the State : Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, AGA. Counsel for the complaint : Mr. Lalit Sharma. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant-Rajesh Singh, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime No.05 of 2025, registered at Police Station Maneri, District Uttarkashi under Sections 109, 117(2), 333, 351(2), 351(3), 352 B.N.S. 2. Heard Mr. Vinod Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned AGA for the State and Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the complainant. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that accused persons forcibly broke the door of the house of the applicant as the first floor of the building belongs to the applicant’s family; videography of this illegal activity has been done by the applicant. He submits that informant wants to grab the inherited 1 1st Bail Application No.1358 of 2025, Rajesh Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand - Ashish Naithani J. 1 2025:UHC:10129 property of the applicant by hook and by crook. He submits that at the time of hearing of bail before learned Sessions Judge there was no medical report on record. He submits that the offence is triable by Magistrate; applicant has no criminal history; he has never been implicated in any criminal case except this. 4. Learned State counsel has opposed the instant bail application. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it is evident that the victim was hit by a piece of tile that cannot be attributed as dangerous weapon meaning thereby had there been any intention otherwise much serious weapon or stone would have been used. The offence is triable my Magistrate. 6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Rajesh Singh be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 15.11.2025 Arti 2 1st Bail Application No.1358 of 2025, Rajesh Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand - Ashish Naithani J. 2 ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.11.17 15:39:19 +05'30'