Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15192 (CHH)

VANDANA JANGADE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2404/2022 · 2025-05-09

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:21917 NAFR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Dated - 10 th May, 2025 CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT CAMPUS-BILASPUR WPS No. 2404 of 2022 1 - Vandana Jangade D/o T.K. Jangade, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Gulshan Vatika, Phase-1, House No. A-19, Shesh Bahar, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Sikll Development, Technical Education and Employment Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner, Cum Director of Technical Education Block 3 . 3rd,4, Floor, Indrawati Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar District Raipur C.G. 3 - Principal Government Engineering Collaged Jagdalpur, District Bastar C.G. ---Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) _________________________________________________________ For Petitioner: Petitioner in person through virtual mode from Govt. Engineering College, Jagdalpur. For State/Respondents : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Awasthi, Nodal Officer (Court Cases) Principal Govt. Girls Poly, Bilaspur. AWARD (PASSED ON 10.05.2025) 1. Parties have filed a compromise petition. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the recovery order issued by respondent No.3 of excess payment made to her towards advance increment in view of additional qualification Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 M.Sc./M.A. Post Graduate Degree. During pendency of the petition the amount has already been recovered from her and now the petitioner is satisfied with the action of the respondents and does not want to prosecute further this petition. Written consent has already been given by the petitioner alongwith the docket form. 3. The State has also no objection if the petitioner is not pressing her petition. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (M.P.S. Bhatia) Judge -Lok Adalat Member- Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur Aadil