IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Petition No.644 of 2025 Decided on: 4th July, 2025 Rahul .......Petitioner versus State of H.P and another ...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Devender Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr.Sushant Keprate, Addl. A.G and Ms.Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.G. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been registered with the Himachal Pradesh Para Veterinary Council, but his case for appointment against the post of Gram Panchayat Veterinary Assistant has not been considered by the department. 2. This relief does not flow from the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.1009 of 2019 titled as Rahul vs. State of H.P and others, decided on 07.04.2021, sought to be executed by way of the instant petition. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 3. Accordingly, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition, by reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail the action of the respondents in not appointing him as a Gram Panchayat Veterinary Assistant, while considering the so called similarly situated persons for grant of the similar relief. Ordered accordingly. 4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge July 04, 2025 ( Sushil Kukreja ) (naveen) Judge