IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1555 of 2025 Decided on: 09.04.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Nazeer Mohd. ....Petitioner Versus Devesh Kumar and Ors …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Respondents are stated to have filed the compliance affidavit in the Registry, however, the same is not on record. A copy of the same, however, was made available for perusal. In terms of the compliance affidavit, respondents have passed the consideration order on 05.01.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has some reservation to the consideration order so passed by the respondents and he, therefore, seeks liberty to assail the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - same. 3. Taking note of the office order, present contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, including against the consideration order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge April 9, 2026 R.Atal