Page No.1 of 2 IN MAC-544-2022 2025:CGHC:48304 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 544 of 2022 1 - Puran Singh Markam S/o Johar Singh, Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Pandariya, Police Station And Sub Tahsil Rengakhar Jangal Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 2 - Sudhari Meravi S/o Najaru Meravi, Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Motimpur, Rengakhar Jangal Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Appellants Versus 1 - Smt. Kusumlata Soni W/o Late Ashok Kumar Soni, Aged About 40 Years Resident Village Old Basti, Village Sagona, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 2 - Asutosh Soni S/o Late Ashok Kumar, Aged About 21 Years Resident Village Old Basti, Village Sagona, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 3 - Siddhant Soni, S/o Late Ashok Kumar, Aged About 18 Years Resident Village Old Basti, Village Sagona, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 4 - Gopichand Soni S/o Late Jhadu Soni Aged About 70 Years Resident Village Old Basti, Village Sagona, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 5 - Amrit Soni, W/o Gopichand Soni, Aged About 65 Years Resident Village Old Basti, Village Sagona, Tahsil Kawardha, District SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN Page No.2 of 2 IN MAC-544-2022 Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Appellants : Mr. CR Sahu, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 19.09.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that mandatory deposit has not been made by the appellant-owner of the vehicle and, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with the liberty to file afresh if said deposit is made. 2. Prayer appears to be reasonable. Accordingly, permission is granted. 3. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if