Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41543-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6788 of 2025 Petitioner :- Usha Pandey And Another Respondent :- Nagar Nigam, Ayodhya Thru. Its Chairman And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Pratap Singh,Raj Deo Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Tushar Kant Mishra,C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard Shri Mahendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Manish Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Tiuhar Kant Mishra, learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam. Learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam does not have written instructions as to whether the road which is being constructed or is proposed to be constructed is by way of an encroachment on Gata No. 358 which the petitioner claims to be his land, or not. Let the petitioners move an application before the opposite party no. 2 who shall get an on the spot inspection/ survey conducted to ascertain as to whether the land of the petitioners is being encroached and if he finds that it is being encroached or utilized without purchasing or acquiring the same, then, he shall immediately stop the constructions and take remedial measures in this regard. If it is found that factual position is otherwise, then, he shall inform the petitioner in writing about the actual position based on the aforesaid exercise which shall be completed within a period of two weeks. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 21.7.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench