Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 151812 (ALL)

NAZAR MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CANE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/7727/2025 · 2025-07-17

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40828 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7727 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nazar Mohammad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Cane Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saryu Prasad Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishana Kumar Singh,Sri Shailendra Srivastava Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1, Sri Himanshu Singh holding brief of Sri Krishna Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2, and Sri Shailendra Srivastava, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.3. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.05.2025 his retiral dues have still not been paid and hence the petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels appearing for respondents have no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. 6. It is also provided that in case any dues are found payable to the petitioner the same would would be paid to him immediately thereafter. 7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 17.7.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench