Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 151810 (ALL)

CHANDRA BHUSHAN v. SRI MANOJ KUMAR SINGH, TAXATION OFFICER / ASSISTANT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER (ADMI.) RAEBARELI

CAPL/3056/2024 · 2025-03-07

Manish Kumar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14074 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3056 of 2024 Applicant :- Chandra Bhushan Opposite Party :- Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, Taxation Officer / Assistant Regional Transport Officer (Admi.) Raebareli Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. The present contempt petition has been preferred for alleged non-compliance of the judgement and order dated 21.03.2024 passed in Writ-C No.2771 of 2024, the relevant extract of the order is quoted hereinbelow: "7. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.5 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date, a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. 8. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. 9. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. " Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions dated 24.08.2023, copy of which has been produced during course of argument, which is taken on record, has submitted that in pursuance of the judgement and order passed by the writ court, the representation of the petitioner has been decided by order dated 20.06.2024, the copy of which has been sent to the applicant. On the other hand learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in compliance of the judgement and order passed by the writ court the representation of petitioner has been decided by order dated 20.06.2024 but rejected the same on the wrong facts or by giving the reason for rejection that the applicant had not deposited the fee as prescribed under the rules, whereas the applicant has filed the transfer application on the prescribed form. On being asked from the learned counsel for the applicant, if the applicant has deposited the fees, kindly provide the receipt of the same, he is unable to show the receipt of Rs.500/- as alleged to be deposited by the applicant. After hearing the learned counsel for the respective parties and going through the record, the direction which was issued by the writ court was to decide the representation of the applicant which has been decided by order dated 20.06.2024, the judgement and order passed by the writ court has been complied with. Hence, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as such. Notice issued earlier, if any, stand discharged. Order Date :- 7.3.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench