Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15180 (RAJ)

MAHESH S/O MANOHARLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5031/2025 · 2025-05-08

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19360] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5031/2025 Mahesh S/o Manoharlal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o House Number 104, Govind Nagar, Police Station Govind Nagar, District Mathura (Uttar Pradesh) (Accused Confined In Central Jail At Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5134/2025 Salman S/o Sh. Ilyas, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Utavar Mohalla, Hateja, Police Station Utavar, Distt. Palwar (Hr). (At Present Petitioner Is Confined Is Confined In Sub Jail Uniyara, Distt. Tonk (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar Mr. Brahma Prakash For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.27/2025 registered at Police Station-Uniara, District-Tonk for the offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, 2023. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. [2025:RJ-JP:19360] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5031/2025] 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the prosecution story, petitioners have been charged for purchasing the mobiles, which alleged to have been stolen from the complainants’ shops. There is no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. Petitioners are behind the bars since 18.03.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Mahesh S/o Manoharlal and Salman S/o Sh. Ilyas shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/158-159