Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1518 (CHH)

Balmik Prasad Shukla v. State Of Chhattisgarh

ACQA/190/2017 · 2025-07-27

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 190 of 2017 Balmik Prasad Shukla S/o Rajeshwar Prasad Shukla, R/o M-407, Mines Colony Bijuri, District Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh. ... Appellant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its District Magistrate, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ashok Sharma S/o Wanshgopal Sharma, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Siwani, Police Station Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Dilip Kumar Sharma S/o Ashok Sharma, Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Siwani, Police Station Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellant : None For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sachidanand Yadav, P.L. For Respondents No.2 and 3 Mr. Sourabh Pandey, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Yougeshwar Sharma, Advocate D.B:-Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal, Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Judgment on Board 28/07/2025 1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. PRASHANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by PRASHANT DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.29 10:46:24 +0530 2 2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for non- prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE JUDGE Prashant