Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41457 Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6550 of 2025 Applicant :- Ramnaresh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Farooq Ayoob,Mansi Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. A supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that general role has been attributed to all three accused persons. Except for Vasudev, simple injuries have been inflicted upon the four injured individuals. From the applicant’s side, two persons also sustained injuries. Both parties have lodged cross-cases. The applicant has been falsely implicated due to personal enmity. His criminal antecedents have been explained in the supplementary affidavit. He is in custody since 03.07.2025. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released from jail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. On due consideration to the nature of allegations in the prosecution case, the period of incarceration undergone by the applicant, the existence of cross-cases filed by both sides, and the explanation regarding his criminal antecedents in the supplementary affidavit, and the fact that he is in jail since 03.07.2025, I am of the view that the applicant deserves to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Ramnaresh involved in Case Crime No. 474/2024, under Sections 110/115(2)/351(2)/333/352/3(5) B.N.S., Police Station-Tikait Nagar, District-Barabanki be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him in accordance with law. (vi) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now Section 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law under Section 174-A IPC (now Section 209 of BNS). It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present anticipatory bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. Order Date :- 21.7.2025/R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench