Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15178 (KAR)

SRI. SRINIVASA RAGAVAN v. SMT. NANDAKUMARI

WP/2735/2020 · 2025-06-30

Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22930 WP No. 2735 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2735 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SRINIVASA RAGAVAN, S/O K. PARTHASARTHY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED, R/O NO.13, BRIVANDAVAN NAGAR, PALAVANTHANGAL, CHENNAI – 600 114. 2. SMT. S. PADMAPRIYA, D/O SRINIVASA RAGAVAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O NO.5250, BRODIE GROVE, COLORADO, USA ZIP 8-919. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI DESHRAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. NANDAKUMARI, W/O SRI YOGANANDASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, PERMANENTLY RESIDENT OF NANDAVANAHALLI, GONITUMKUR, TQ TURUVEKERE, TUMKUR. NOW PRESENTLY R/O NO.24, 2ND CROSS, BABUSPALYA, BENGALURU – 560 043. 2. SRI R. PADMANABHAN, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O NO.651, VIJAYA BANK COLONY, DODDABANASAWADI, Digitally signed by CHAITHRA P Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22930 WP No. 2735 of 2020 BANGALORE – 560 043. …RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 21.06.2022) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED IN I.A.NO.1/2016 IN O.S.NO.5806/2012 DATED 22.01.2020 BY THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU (CCH-44) AT ANNEXURE-K BY ALLOWING I.A.1/2016 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN/DEFENDANTS THEREIN. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: "The petitioner No.2 is not interested in Prosecuting the above matter. Hence the above matter may be dismissed as not pressed, in the interest of justice." In view of the said memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE CPN