Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 151774 (ALL)

MAYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. SECY. BAL VIKAS PUSHTAHAR LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/7706/2025 · 2025-07-17

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40794 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7706 of 2025 Petitioner :- Maya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Bal Vikas Pushtahar Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abdul Alim Khan,Mohd. Vakar Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite party no. 1 to 5. 2. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite party no. 6 is dispensed with. 3. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 29.4.2025 whereby petitioner's candidature for the post of Anganbadi Karyakatri in Village Balki Ka Purwa, H/o Mahuri Kala, Block Jarwal, Tehsil Kaisarganj, District Bahraich has been rejected. 4. From perusal of impugned order, it appears that earlier as well petitioner has filed a Writ-A No. 3742 of 2025, which was disposed of vide order dated 7.4.2025 directing the concerned authority to decide petitioner's representation. It is in pursuance thereof that impugned order has been passed rejecting petitioner's representation. 5. Upon perusal of aforesaid impugned order, it is evident that petitioner had applied in handicapped quota but did not submit any documentary proof to corroborate such an assertion. The impugned order has quoted the relevant government order to indicate that such documents were required to be uploaded along with application for seeking such benefit whereas petitioner submitted such documents subsequently offline, which could not have been considered. 6. Learned counsel for petitioner has been unable to demonstrate any provisions of law whereby such documents submitted subsequent to application form on offline basis could have been considered. 7. There does not appears to any occasion to grant indulgence, therefore, petition fails and is dismissed at the admission stage itself. 8. Parties to bear their own costs. Order Date :- 17.7.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench