Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 151771 (ALL)

ANAND PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 10 OTHERS

WRIC/6728/2025 · 2025-07-22

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41764-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6728 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anand Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. There is a private dispute between the petitioner and the private opposite parties. A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not the remedy. The petitioner should avail other remedies, as may be prescribed in law. If the revenue authorities are interfering unnecessarily and illegally, the petitioner should approach the Sub-Divisional Magistrate concerned who shall get the matter enquired and if he finds that there is a cause, he shall do the needful, otherwise, he shall inform the petitioner about the correct factual position. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench